2019

All posts from 2019

Curated Insights from the Discussion on “The Modern Finance Leader: Navigating Risk In The Digital Era”

by Zoe Tuico on September 25, 2019 No comments

This month, The Ortus Club gathered CFOs, senior finance leaders, and finance managers from prominent companies in Kuala Lumpur to discuss, share, and theorise on navigating financial risks to a company in today’s digital era: specifically how transformation affects finance functions and the new responsibilities of financial leaders.

The discussion was held once again at Grand Hyatt, Kuala Lumpur, on September 12th, 2019. Present at the discussion were the following:

  • Alan Lew Head, Group Treasury of Wah Seong Corporation
  • Aravinthan Tharmaindran, CFO of IPG Mediabrands
  • Audrey Ho, Director of Corporate Strategy of Prudential Malaysia
  • Azizan Abd Aziz, CFO of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad
  • Azizul Rahman Mohd Basir, CEO of Kub Telekomunikasi
  • Billy Ooi Giap Hwa, Deputy Head of Finance of Wah Seong
  • Chee Shean Wong, Regional Finance Manager & Head of Customer Service Centralisation of Wilhelmsen Ships Service
  • Ganeswaran Nadason, CFO of Terengganu Industrial Mineral
  • James Qiu, CFO of iflix
  • Kit Seong Lee, CFO of AEON Credit Service
  • Lily Ling Leong Shuang, Senior Manager Corporate Finance of Sapura Energy Berhad
  • Milind Jadhav, CFO of Pacific Inter-link
  • Mirko Dierks, CFO of Zuellig Pharma
  • Mustafa Shafiq Razalli, Senior VP, Finance of Bursa Malaysia
  • Sandran Govindasamy, CFO of India International Bank
  • Shyam Gowrikumar, Head of Finance of Hengyuan Refining Company Berhad
  • Sim Siew Chan, Group Financial Controller of Air Asia
  • Stan Zabolotsky, CFO & COO of Ta Win Holdings
  • Tan Ming Yew, Group Financial Controller of AmBank Group
  • Wilson Soon, CFO of TNG Digital
  • Wong Sheng Taur, CFO of Muda Holdings

The Modern Finance Leader: Navigating Risk In The Digital Era

   

Finance faces a tremendous amount of responsibility: aside from answering to shareholders, compiling reports, and overseeing resources, they now face a new duty in risk management. Coupled with the importance and ever-shrinking timetable that companies face for digital finance transformation, how can people in finance juggle their usual duties while looking out for an uncertain future in the digital age?

Three questions guided the discussion:

  • How should risk management be organized to deliver effectively?
  • How can transformation be delivered through digitization and ecosystems?
  • How does the modern finance leader cope with the evolving risks in this modern age?

The following article is a summation of the answers to those three questions, as well as other key points raised during the discussion.

Inherent Risks In Finance Transformation

Risk is an ever-present factor in financing. While the companies in attendance already agreed that they’ve taken steps to mitigate a lot of potential risks when it comes to finance, they also acknowledged that there are certain risks that will never go away. “Laws and regulations are an inherent risk that every company needs to take,” said one of the CFOs. “Compliance is never a sure thing.”

This need to be able to address potential issues on the fly brought up the subject of digital finance transformation – the ability to move old systems of financing to a more technical platform. Most CFOs agreed that this was a process that all their companies needed to undergo, but the pace at which they do it varied greatly from industry to industry.

Admittedly, the changing of finance systems can be considered a risk for many in the finance department – but it’s one that can be mitigated by having the correct personnel and systems in place to smooth over the transition. Some CFOs confidently asserted that they have already seen small-scale successes in their own organisations, and are slowly rolling out bigger changes.

Finance transformation may be the future for finance, but many have expressed concern that the changes may not arrive fast or as well-thought out as they could be. Timelines were the biggest issue, with some saying that their projections keep pushing back, and others saying that the demand for newer systems was something they struggle to keep up with.

Is Finance Properly Equipped To Understand New Technologies And Systems?

Personnel and technical expertise is at the heart of risk management, especially when it comes to finance transformation. While the finance managers in attendance had a closer look at the changes required from the ground up, the room agreed that the responsibility to act ultimately fell on the CFO: “it’s really up to us CFOs to take the initiative here – to align with what the company needs. We need to check what other companies are doing and what the market requires.”

This urgency for initiative when it comes to transformation strategies highlight one of the many challenges financing faces for risk management: the capacity for them to both do their usual duties and watch out for the signs that point to disaster. “It’s important to not transform things for the sake of transforming them, or just change things because you can,” stressed one CFO. “We need to do this smartly or not at all.”

Most of the room agreed with the need for training and connection between systems and control. The negative consequences of leaving inexperienced (or worse, fraudulent) personnel in key financing positions was a danger that everyone acknowledged. “Finance people don’t have the luxury of making mistakes – there’s too much at stake,” said one manager.

And while most were confident in their systems now, there was an agreed uncertainty with the systems that they have in their efficiency as time goes on. “Transformation is essential because the market changes so fast,” shared one CFO. Companies no longer had the luxury of upscaling operation or reshuffling resources when needed – they need to better with what they have, and mitigate the risks to what they can acquire in the process.

The Unique Challenge Faced By Companies In Their Respective Industries

However, some companies were more vulnerable to risks than others. Bigger companies in more regulated industries have a consistent urgency to always be one step ahead in their risk management strategies. Smaller, newer, and digital-first companies had more time and flexibility to react to potential changes, in addition to having a smaller stake in case things go wrong.

“Cost is what makes these things complicated,” said one CFO. As companies shuffle their resources and financing in order to address or mitigate risks, other areas will inevitably be affected. “The size of the company, the industry we operate in, and the regulations that we follow – all of these are factors in our finance transformation strategies.”

Shareholders are also a unique challenge: “How can finance tell the board members that they need to invest more to mitigate this particular risk?” shares one manager. Communication, another reveals, is always going to be a potential risk as well: “We need to figure out how adaptable our stakeholders are before we do anything major.” CFOs will need to balance the demands of the company with the demands of its investors – a task that many in attendance do not find easy, but necessary.

Conclusion

While the digital age has offered plenty of value for finance to more effectively oversee operations, it’s also allowed them a bird’s-eye view of the inherent dangers of unmitigated risk. CFOs and finance departments will need to quickly adapt to the tools and expertise required to navigate these dangerous waters – and in doing so, ensure their company’s survival.

read more
Zoe TuicoCurated Insights from the Discussion on “The Modern Finance Leader: Navigating Risk In The Digital Era”

Curated Insights From The Dinner Discussion On “The Power Of The Platform”

by admin on July 2, 2019 No comments

How is the relationship between your technology and your data?

Last month, the Ortus Club and Domo Hong Kong hosted a dinner with the intent of answering this question. This event gathered CEOs, VIPs, directors, and other group heads for a discussion at The Hong Kong Club. The agenda was as follows:

  • What technologies, products or services do you use to improve data management?
  • How did your company transition from the use of legacy systems?
  • What were the most significant implications observed with this transition?

The following is a select overview of the ideas shared during the dinner.

 

The Primary Uses Of Data In The Workplace

The majority of the gathered executives agreed that their primary use for data is mainly for assessment and improvement of operational processes. This isn’t very surprising, as previous discussions on data have shown that companies place great care in their metrics – but it does enforce the importance of how that data is handled, collated, and reported.

In general, it seems like the trend of data usage in companies today mainly point inwards: the second avenue where data is used the most is improving the skill of the employees via testing and training. Only a very small number of companies said that their data is used to improve external processes – namely, interactions with both clients and suppliers – perhaps pointing to the trend that it’s automation, not staff, that takes care of that aspect.

 

The Role Of Legacy Systems

As a cloud-based mobile compatible data platform, Domo was curious to know how companies dealt with legacy systems when it comes to their workplace. The answers were split evenly: half the companies already transitioned from the use of outdated technology, but the other half had not.

Common reasons cited by the naysayers included that even despite knowing the importance of transitioning to a better system, their companies still lacked the resources or training required to operate them to peak efficiency. If anything, it indicates the potential of cross-collaboration between platforms that provide data management and training services with companies that are just starting to modernize their operations.

Data management in legacy systems was passable back in the day, but the companies that have transitioned out of it – or were already using them to start with – function more productively with features like cloud-based computing and real-time data management. Those that use these systems tended to devote less of their time to data collection and poured more resources into data analysis.

The Challenges Faced By Companies Moving Forward

Even with the split between the role of old tech versus new market demands, there were still some concerns about accurately leveraging data. Like previous discussions, there was an emphasis on actually translating said data into something useable and understandable: the need to bridge the gap between the technical and business side of things.

Most companies agreed that it’s this gap that makes data infinitely more valuable once crossed. The majority of companies today may switch to more efficient and modern systems for data management, but the crux of the data still lies in both analysis and reporting – a skill that has yet to solidify for many departments.

 

Conclusion

Data management relies on the collection and interpretation of raw information – something that’s made easier by moving to a modern platform that can account for and display the data required on demand, and with a reasonable margin for error. Companies today know this, and this is why their attentions are now focused inward: on the challenges faced on making that data useable, and training the people that can do so.

It is the hope of the Ortus Club and companies like Domo that by these discussions, companies will eventually be able to find a solution to leveraging data and technology. As the market grows even denser with both competition and demand, interpreting information – no matter how small – is the most likely key to a company’s success.

read more
adminCurated Insights From The Dinner Discussion On “The Power Of The Platform”

Curated Insights On The Dinner About “The Use of Big Data to Improve the Workplace”

by admin on April 25, 2019 No comments

At the beginning of this month, the Ortus Club brought together a group CFOs, COOs, and CEOs in Singapore for a dinner at Artemis Grill. The agenda to discuss was simple: how can big data — specifically, the ones collected via internal study and financial metrics — affect how the company’s physical workspaces were designed.

The discussion was guided by these questions:

  • Is there an active effort being made in order to innovate the use of Big Data in your company? Is that an advantage or a disadvantage?
  • What ways can technology and big data benefit human-centric workplaces?
  • Does Big Data influence the decisions you make for your company? If yes, how so?
  • How do you see Big Data concerns shaping the way your company works in the next 5 years?
  • If you could ask one question to all participants, what would it be?

The following are select insights and discussion points from the dinner that followed.

On the innovating the use of big data and the inherent advantages and disadvantages of doing so

As a whole, most participants seemed to agree that big data should absolutely be a driving factor in how their workplaces are designed. The majority of them affirm that their companies are doing something to innovate the use of big data in their workplace and that such an approach can only be advantageous to their company’s operations.

The minority that disagreed stated that their own studies on the matter — as well the current trends in their financing — plays a bigger role than big data. Alternatively, it could also mean that their own processes for collating and analyzing the results aren’t up to par to what they want to see.

On the human-centric factor in their workplaces and big data as a driver for strategies

Many agreed that big data has definitely strengthened the human-centric factor in their workplaces. Big data has shaped how their processes, tools, and even the technology that they use in their operations work with their employees and personnel.

Big data also factored into the majority of their business decisions, with many stating that it helps to refine their core competencies, gives them a better understanding of their customers and employees, and leads to a more efficient workplace.

On the future of big data and questions they want answered

The discussion culminated in the question of how big data will impact their companies performance and strategies in the next five years. Many of them have stated that big data will be a critical component in understanding how their business metrics can be improved, or their customer profiles are more accurately gauged. In particular, these observations also focused on the different tools that can be used to interpret big data, and how can they fit in a company’s roadmap.

Some of the questions that were raised revolved around specifics: how can big data affect certain industries, how data is mined, and who can (and should) have access to this data. These questions show that even despite the proof of big data as help to companies, more study is required to properly define the tangible benefits it provides.

 

Conclusion

While big data is definitely a possible source of more information for companies on how to improve every aspect of their operations (both inside and outside the company), the meeting ultimately stressed the need to define these processes, as well as implement measurable success targets that companies can follow. Ultimately, while the human-centric factor is an essential part of optimizing any company, more study is required to fully bring out its potential.

read more
adminCurated Insights On The Dinner About “The Use of Big Data to Improve the Workplace”